Month: June 2025

  • No Kings Speech – Confronting White Progressive Gatekeeping & Kingmakers

    On June 14, 2024, Gabriel Duncan, founder of the Alameda Native History Project, delivered a speech at the Alameda No Kings Rally that challenged white progressives’ role in Gatekeeping, and Kingmaking.

    But if we think “No Kings” only means no Trump, we’re missing something deeper.
    Kings don’t always wear crowns.
    Sometimes they wear progressive credentials.
    Sometimes they come wrapped in good intentions.
    Sometimes they’re lifted up—not because they earned it,
    but because people would rather believe a lie than sit with discomfort.

    In a pointed speech, Gabriel Duncan made the difference between performative allies, and Accomplices clear:

    You say you want to be allies.
    But performative allies want credit.
    Accomplices show up when it’s risky, when no one’s watching.

    If you need to be thanked or centered or safe,
    you’re not in solidarity. You’re just performing.

    He went on to draw the distinction between white allies who have the privilege to join the struggle, and BIPOC people who are forced to live it every day:

    You weren’t born into this fight,
    but you can choose to join it.
    Not to be centered—but to be useful.

    And then he went on to introduce the performance of a song called “Ain’t Nobody Gon’ Turn Us ‘Round”: a 1964 Civil Rights Era, Black Spiritual and Protest Song, written and sung by Black People in jails and churches, while Black People were facing police brutality, high pressure water hoses, police dogs, and police brutality, just for a crumb–for human rights.

    This song was performed by “Paul Andrews [an old white man] and the Democracy Out Loud Band [a group of white singers enlisted days before the event]”, who would be singing this song at an even where no black voices were heard.

    That was incorrect, Nika Kura, who sang in the beginning of the program, identifies as Black. And–after I had called out the organizers and Paul Andrews–a black mother and educator, named Katherine Castro (who you can hear saying “I’m trying!” in the recording), took the stage and spoke, and counted how many black people were even present in the audience.

    We’re proud to have made this space for black voices–because it was the right thing to do. And we hope that this moment becomes a teachable moment for the organizers of this event, and our allies.

    A Note About Paul Andrews, The Old White Man Who Grossly Appropriated A Black Civil Rights Song About Segregation:

    We’re deeply disappointed that Paul Andrews thought it was appropriate to sing a Black Spiritual even though he is not black, and the song is about segregation. We’re even more disappointed that Paul Andrews attempted to defend his choice–and even go so far as to try and claim “Ain’t Nobody Gon’ Turn Us ‘Round” was not a Black Song; even though he himself admitted the song was created by Black People. It’s 2025, and this type of misappropriation of BIPOC identity, culture, and struggle is not not welcome in these spaces anymore.

    We plan to interview the main organizer of this rally, Tina Davis, a volunteer with Indivisible. So stay tuned for that. We’ll also be releasing our interview with Mary Claire, of All Rise Alameda, soon.

    If “No Kings” means anything,
    it has to mean the end of white progressives deciding
    who gets heard and who gets erased.

    For the record: between 3,000 and 4,700 people were in attendance at the Alameda No Kings Rally on June 14, 2025.

    This is the complete speech:

    Text of the speech:

    NO KINGS – 3-Minute Rally Speech (Condensed Version)
    “How the Pressure Is Working”
    Gabriel Duncan

    We came here today because we know what’s wrong.
    Because we see injustice. Because we feel the weight of it.
    No one should have the power to strip rights, silence truth, or rule unchecked.

    That’s why we say: No Kings.

    But if we think “No Kings” only means no Trump, we’re missing something deeper.

    Kings don’t always wear crowns.
    Sometimes they wear progressive credentials.
    Sometimes they come wrapped in good intentions.
    Sometimes they’re lifted up
    not because they earned it,
    but because people would rather believe a lie
    than sit with discomfort.

    That’s not justice. That’s curation.
    That’s not solidarity. That’s theater.

    Real change comes from those who risk something.
    And lately, more people are risking more
    breaking ranks, refusing comfort.
    That’s how we know: the pressure is working.

    For too long, white progressives have been kingmakers.
    Choosing voices that made them feel good.
    Even when those voices weren’t real.
    That wasn’t solidarity. That was projection. That was control.

    Crowning someone because they’re convenient
    is how white supremacy adapts.
    It cloaks itself in “progress,” selects leaders who keep critique shallow and power safe.

    The danger of performative allyship isn’t just that it’s fake
    it’s that it props up lies that do real harm.
    Harm to truth. Harm to movements. Harm to us.

    If “No Kings” means anything,
    it has to mean the end of white progressives deciding
    who gets heard and who gets erased.

    You say you want to be allies.
    But performative allies want credit.
    Accomplices show up when it’s risky, when no one’s watching.

    If you need to be thanked or centered or safe,
    you’re not in solidarity. You’re just performing.
    You can’t say “No Kings” while defending the figureheads you crowned
    just because they made you feel progressive.

    Being an accomplice means you put yourself in the way
    of ICE, of cops, of injustice
    and say:
    “You’ll have to go through me first.”

    That’s what pressure looks like.
    Truth without applause. Risk without reward.

    You weren’t born into this fight,
    but you can choose to join it.
    Not to be centered—but to be useful.

    So when we scream NO KINGS
    don’t just cheer. Don’t just post.
    Live it.

    Say it with your whole chest.
    Say it in every space where your voice still carries more weight than ours.

    No Kings.
    No Gatekeepers.
    No Masters.
    TOTAL LIBERATION.

  • Press Release: Alameda No Kings Rally – June 14, 2025

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    Gabriel Duncan to Deliver Official Muwekma Ohlone Land Acknowledgment and Speech at June 14 No Kings Rally

    ALAMEDA, CA – Gabriel Duncan, Founder and Executive Director of the Alameda Native History Project, will deliver the official Muwekma Ohlone Land Acknowledgment and a speech titled “How Our Pressure Is Working” at the No Kings Rally on Saturday, June 14, 2025, at Alameda City Hall.

    The official Land Acknowledgment, authorized by the Muwekma Ohlone Tribe of the San Francisco Bay Area, will open the rally at 12:00 PM. This acknowledgment is presented in accordance with tribal protocol and reflects the Tribe’s sovereign presence and ancestral connection to the land now known as Alameda.

    Duncan will return to the stage at 12:36 PM to speak on the dangers of symbolic solidarity, curated resistance, and the structures that continue to marginalize truth in favor of comfort. His remarks will ground the event in real-time struggles for justice across California, from San Diego to Concord, and underscore the responsibility to act with clarity rather than perform unity.

    Known for his leadership in Indigenous food sovereignty, environmental justice, and public historical truth-telling, Duncan is one of the only individuals in Alameda delivering officially sanctioned Land Acknowledgments on behalf of the Muwekma Ohlone Tribe. His participation in the No Kings Rally is both a recognition of ongoing movement work and a disruption of narratives that seek to flatten it.

    This event is part of a national day of action opposing authoritarianism and political repression. It includes a community food drive for local residents in need. Participants are encouraged to bring non-perishable food items for donation. The site is on flat, paved ground. Attendees are welcome to bring lawn or camp chairs for comfort.

    Media Contact:

    Gabriel Duncan
    Founder & Executive Director
    Alameda Native History Project
    info@nativehistoryproject.org
    (510) 747-8423
    https://NativeHistoryProject.org/

    Event Details:

    Saturday, June 14, 2025
    12:00 PM to 1:00 PM
    Alameda City Hall

    2263 Santa Clara Ave
    Alameda, CA 94501

    Land Acknowledgment – 12:00 PM
    No Kings Speech – 12:36 PM

  • Bay Area MakerFarm: Filth, Unaccountability, and Vibes Over Safety

    Effective June 5, 2025, the Alameda Native History Project has permanently ended its affiliation with Bay Area MakerFarm. This decision follows MakerFarm’s failure to perform in response to an unresolved food safety hazard posed by its walk-in refrigerator unit that remains structurally unsound, unsanitary, and incapable of maintaining safe refrigeration temperatures.

    The Alameda Native History Project initially suspended operations at MakerFarm on May 24, 2025, after repeated warnings were ignored. The organization issued a formal Notice of Suspension of Activities & Intent to Disclose, citing extensive documentation, including:

    • Over 400 pounds of rotting produce removed by ANHP from the walk-in on April 16
    • Temperature readings of 43°F–46°F, well above the USDA safe threshold of 40°F
    • Spoilage of fresh rabbit meat intended for a public event due to inadequate refrigeration
    • Manufacturer correspondence confirming the existing A/C unit was under-powered for the space

    Despite these warnings and a clearly stated remediation deadline, Bay Area MakerFarm took no effective action. Instead of correcting the hazard, Bay Area MakerFarm minimized the danger,

    re-framed documented concerns as interpersonal issues, and failed to uphold even basic standards of care or responsibility.

    On June 5, 2025, ANHP issued a final Notice of Permanent Suspension of Activities and Withdrawal of Free Association. This notice cited failure to perform, breach of duty, disregard for public health, and misalignment with the standards of care required for Indigenous cultural work. MakerFarm was instructed to remove all references to ANHP from its website, signage, publications, and promotional materials.

    This withdrawal is not about conflict. It is about care.

    Food sovereignty requires food safety. Cultural work requires clean, safe environments. Community spaces must be accountable to the people they serve. We cannot, and will not, associate our work with conditions that put our community at risk.

    To be clear: the negligence and unsanitary conditions at Bay Area MakerFarm have had no impact on the success of our programming. The Alameda Native History Project remains fully self-sustaining and independently organized. The ACORNS! Project Arc continues without interruption, and upcoming events will proceed as planned.

    Our work is sacred and community-oriented. It cannot be shaken by a white-led organization that shrouds itself in the language of inclusion but, in practice, cultivates a hostile environment for BIPOC, non-binary individuals, and anyone whose dissent demands accountability.

    Bay Area MakerFarm is structured around process idealism, not functional governance.

    For BIPOC individuals entering these spaces, the dissonance is immediate. You’re told you’re welcome, but the minute you name harm or point out gaps in care, the tone shifts. Suddenly, you’re “too intense,” or you’re “not being collaborative.” Your lived experience is pathologized. Your insistence on accountability is framed as aggression. If you’ve ever felt isolated, second-guessed yourself, or wondered if you were overreacting, you weren’t. You were being gaslit by a structure that protects comfort over truth and feelings over safety.

    What happened at Bay Area MakerFarm is not an anomaly. It is the default operating mode of too many white-led, self-proclaimed progressive collectives.

    These are spaces built on white fragility, trustafarian politics, and a curated aesthetic of care that masks deep resistance to real accountability. They specialize in optics over outcomes, claiming to be inclusive while maintaining structures that ensure power remains concentrated and critique is punished.

    These environments weaponize process to maintain the status quo, and perform emotional labor not to address harm, but to center themselves in it.

    The ‘confusion’ and ‘hurt’ expressed by leadership are not genuine steps toward repair. They are tactics of delay and deflection. The endless talking circles, the forced emotional exposure, the vague invitations to ‘build understanding’—these are not accountability mechanisms. They are containment strategies designed to absorb dissent and protect those in power.

    If you’ve been in these spaces and felt like you were being handled instead of heard, you were.

    If you’ve been encouraged to participate in healing rituals while the root causes of harm were never addressed, you weren’t imagining things. This is the blueprint. And Bay Area MakerFarm followed it exactly, until we walked away.

    When valid safety concerns, grounded in health codes, USDA guidelines, and food safety best practices, were dismissed as a “fancy A/C purchase,” it was an intentional act of gaslighting.

    This re-framing didn’t just diminish the issue. It recast an urgent health risk as a personal whim, discrediting the messenger to avoid responsibility.

    It sent a clear message: evidence doesn’t matter, what matters is preserving comfort and control.

    This is not about collaboration; it’s about conformity to a structure that protects those in power while discrediting those who speak up. Your expertise, your warnings, your truth all become irrelevant the moment they challenge the dominant narrative.

    When someone ripped the locking bracket off the door of a shared space with zero consequence, in spite of the fact we were all given the code to the dial lock, it signaled that even basic safety and boundary-setting could be violated without accountability, if you were the right person.

    And when that same someone ripped carefully cultivated plants out of the soil, offering a hollow apology deflected by ‘I thought you said…,’ it underscored not only a disregard for labor, presence, and contributions, but a deeper refusal to recognize the agency and personhood of BIPOC participants.

    This was not carelessness. It was a pattern: a way of diminishing harm by rewriting intent, shifting blame, and robbing people of the right to define what has happened to them.

    The lack of regard, care, concern, or consequences, reinforced a message many BIPOC folks know too well: you’re only welcome for as long as we allow it. It’s not your consent, it’s ours. The moment you assert boundaries, ask for accountability, or disrupt the illusion of harmony, you become the problem.

    Bay Area MakerFarm’s consent-based model is ideologically rigid and operationally brittle, built to neutralize dissent rather than incorporate accountability.

    Its core principle, that a ‘No’ is an invitation to leave, is framed as a way to prevent obstruction and support momentum. But in practice, it punishes those who raise necessary concerns, especially BIPOC individuals who name harm.

    The message becomes clear: if you cannot quietly consent to a flawed process, you must remove yourself. This doesn’t build consensus, it enforces silence. And it enables those in power to preserve their comfort while pushing out anyone who challenges it.

    The organization’s reliance on free association, siloed committees, and performative inclusivity enables a culture where responsibility is diffused and no one is held accountable.

    Committees operate without real oversight. Urgent concerns are reframed as procedural obstacles. Individuals with lived experience are pushed out when they raise inconvenient truths, especially when those truths reveal deep cultural or structural harm.

    For BIPOC participants, this pattern is not a glitch, it’s a feature. Your concerns become disruptions. Your calls for care are labeled conflict. And your presence becomes untenable the moment it asks too much of a system designed to protect white comfort.

    To white participants and leaders in these spaces: you may believe you are building collective power, but what you’re often building is a structure of exclusion.

    When your systems require emotional neutrality to be heard, and protect the process more than the people, you’re not creating platforms of care, you are reinforcing structures which cause very real and tangible harm.

    When you equate disagreement with obstruction, and disagreement from BIPOC people as hostility, what you’re really doing is preserving a hierarchy where safety and belonging are only available to those who never question the rules.

    The result is a space that not only fails to uphold health and safety, but also betrays the very values it claims to uphold.

    We believe in collaboration without compromise.

    As stated in our Working With Us guidelines: “We do not believe in compromising our values to maintain partnerships. We believe that true collaboration is only possible with honesty, transparency, and accountability.

    Our partnerships are grounded in mutual respect, transparency, and accountability. We expect spaces that align with our values to center care, uphold safety, and take responsibility, not just in language, but in practice.

    Our approach is rooted in Indigenous principles. We bring our full selves to the work, as Two-Spirit, BIPOC, and community-led organizers committed to food sovereignty, safety, and collective care.

    We do not stay silent when harm is ignored, minimized, or redirected through performative process.

    When we walk away, it is not to create drama. It is because staying would require us to betray the very responsibilities we carry.

    We did not leave Bay Area MakerFarm because of a disagreement. We left because they refused to take accountability. And we will not allow their dysfunction to jeopardize the sacredness of our work.

    The Alameda Native History Project has moved on.

    To every BIPOC person who’s been silenced, gaslit, or pushed out of a space that claimed to value you… this is your reminder: you’re not imagining things.

    You deserve spaces that meet you with integrity, not containment. And you don’t owe your labor to collectives that can’t hold themselves accountable.

    We see you. We believe you. You are not alone.


    Appendix: Documents